BUCKET BUCKET BUCKET BUCKET BUCKET BUCKET BUCKET BUCKET BUCKET BUCKET
" if someone writes an abusive factoid about you and the ops have not corrected it, please feel free to edit it yourself." we're allowed to do this, now? I thought that it was not only against the rules, but against bucket's programming, and that nickchanging to edit your own factoid was frowned upon.
also, about abusive factoids: there are PLENTY of abusive factoids. where does one draw the line? is any offensive content considered abusive? I understand no racism, no general hate, but what about "snark is an arsefaggot"? I'm sure snark wouldn't be offended, but someone else could surely be offended by the political incorrectness of "faggot". And what about others, who don't take bucket factoids in a spirit of fun, but are offended by something as simple as "NewGuy <likes> to bugger sheep"?
please clarify these things. I am not trying to bend the rules or push the envelope, I just want to avoid getting banned from bucket. I <3 bucket.
I assume the twitter bucket does not use unmoderated factoids, is this correct? also, mad props to WHOMEVER (zigdon?) because that is a hilarious idea, and might actually get me to use twitter. ps this was me --\(☣∪☣)/ (talk)(contribs) 18:00, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
Dude, get some balls 220.127.116.11 12:18, 5 January 2011 (EST)
I realize the wget method works, but perhaps it would be better to remove it in favor of the git instructions to ensure all the proper files are downloaded. Axanon 15:30, 8 January 2012 (EST)