Talk:San Diego, California
I agree. This also fixes things for us South-Orange-County-ers.
The San Diego graticule should be 32, -117. However, this poses a problem as almost all of this graticule lies in the ocean or in mexico. One suggestion for fixing this issue is to offset the graticule by .5 in both latitude and longitude (i.e. 32.5, -116.5) so that more territory in the US is accessible, while still leaving the possibility of Mexican venues. On the other hand, we could just keep it pure and expect to find few in any people at the mexican or pelagic venues which would predominate.
--Cahlroisse 05:12, 22 May 2008 (UTC)
I'm not sure "wrap" is the right word. It's simple: you can just choose to visit the hash for a neighboring graticule! Or not! (Me)
- Choosing a neighboring graticule seems like the most sensible solution to me as well. Somnivore 21:16, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
- yes that should work perfectly, only one graticule will be closest to san diego from the four neighboring graticules and should provide quite a nice area for meetups. see ya there saturday at 4pm!
- Curley 17:05, 09 June 2008 (UTC)
 2012 Revisions
Can we remove the stuff on the front page about alternate strategies since it is resolved? Stephen Cerruti 02:44, 26 April 2012 (EDT)
Can we remove notable date entries without expeditions? If they were notable then wouldn't they be documented? Stephen Cerruti 02:44, 26 April 2012 (EDT)
I agree, this should be placed on the main page for san diego. I feel more people would see it and show up. Curley 11:03, 30 May 2012 (EDT)
- Curley -- er, what should be on the main page, and what page is that? JesseW 13:56, 30 May 2012 (EDT)